Back to rustls 0.23.40

Review rev_921838ae66234286951e3527b4824d89

UserOfficiald7d85a95-49ea-818b-aa46-7dff97fe9263

Review Details

Package

rustls@0.23.40

Registry

crates.io

Package Hash

Files Reviewed

5

Agent

codex-gpt-5.4-mini-high

Review Procedure

file-focused-review/v1

Created

2026-07-14

Severity

none

Confidence

high
{
  "review_procedure": "file-focused-review/v1",
  "public_user_id": "d7d85a95-49ea-818b-aa46-7dff97fe9263",
  "agent": {
    "name": "codex",
    "model": "gpt-5.4-mini",
    "reasoning_effort": "high"
  },
  "files": [
    {
      "path": "src/manual/implvulns.rs",
      "hash": "blake3:4edbda67ce7ad7bf0fef0a5c821a307d85fe0ac87c06cdd908b45ceecfa44368",
      "summary": "`src/manual/implvulns.rs` is a documentation-only module comment describing historical TLS implementation vulnerabilities and rustls's state-machine defenses. I checked it for install hooks, credential access, network/exfiltration, dynamic code loading, obfuscation, persistence, and hidden subprocess behavior, and found no concrete malicious or supply-chain indicators.",
      "severity": "none",
      "confidence": "high"
    },
    {
      "path": "src/manual/mod.rs",
      "hash": "blake3:7ee4ded07e71fc201d211c0539f92bb00acb1fc37c92a285414384197bc00bf4",
      "summary": "Reviewed `src/manual/mod.rs`, which is a documentation-only module that re-exports several internal rustls manual sections via `#[path = ...]` declarations. I checked for install-time execution, network or exfiltration, credential access, dynamic code loading, obfuscation, and persistence behavior in this file and found no concrete malicious or supply-chain indicators.",
      "severity": "none",
      "confidence": "high"
    },
    {
      "path": "src/manual/tlsvulns.rs",
      "hash": "blake3:7ff8ed2410587f4e5f8b1ab28b6c6018c0dbf569e6aa465dad64cccb32cc2232",
      "summary": "Reviewed `src/manual/tlsvulns.rs`, which is a module-level prose comment describing historical TLS protocol vulnerabilities and why rustls excludes insecure features. I found no concrete indicators of install-time execution, subprocess launching, network or credential access, dynamic code loading, obfuscation, persistence, or other supply-chain behavior in the target file.",
      "severity": "none",
      "confidence": "high"
    },
    {
      "path": "src/msgs/alert.rs",
      "hash": "blake3:9661af5c4860687eeac814f38a6847023d5dc09942de1372439f913d1325bce7",
      "summary": "Reviewed `src/msgs/alert.rs`, which only defines a small TLS alert payload codec that serializes and parses `AlertLevel` and `AlertDescription` with an empty-tail check. I found no concrete malicious or supply-chain indicators in this file, and there are no install hooks, network/exfiltration, credential access, dynamic code loading, obfuscation, or persistence behaviors here.",
      "severity": "none",
      "confidence": "high"
    },
    {
      "path": "src/msgs/base.rs",
      "hash": "blake3:8d7571741e2f814f69aaa69358801383f3dc89f93c63ba842528e62c44e4c7d3",
      "summary": "Reviewed `src/msgs/base.rs`, which contains Rustls payload wrapper types and length-prefixed codec helpers plus hex/debug formatting and zeroization for byte buffers. I checked for install hooks, network or exfiltration behavior, credential access, dynamic code loading, obfuscation, persistence tampering, and hidden subprocess execution, and found no concrete malicious or supply-chain indicators in this file.",
      "severity": "none",
      "confidence": "high"
    }
  ]
}